10 financial New Year’s resolutions

Five moves to get your finances in order for the New Year

Canadians’ choice for New Year’s resolutions: “save money”

Make a financial resolution to start your New Year

Sensing a theme?

There’s no surprise here. “Saving money” follows close behind the perennial champions “lose weight/quit smoking” for New Year’s resolutions by Canadians.

But just like so many other goals, we often give up in frustration long before reaching the objective. The biggest reason: taking on too much too fast. If you want to lose weight, don’t try to go from couch-surfing and nachos to marathon workouts and all-broccoli diets overnight. Very few people can quit smoking cold turkey. And most people aren’t going to be able to cut their spending in half and start maxing out their RRSPs if they were living paycheque-to-paycheque.

The secret to success? Start small.

I’m only now coming back from nearly three years of physical inactivity due to injuries. I’ve lost a lot of muscle and put on a lot of weight. If I tried to jump right back in to where I was at my physical peak I would very likely re-aggravate my injuries and set myself back another six months or more. Instead, I’m taking it slow, and getting help. I’ve been meeting with a physiotherapist and a personal trainer to help design an exercise program that is appropriate for where I am today, and gets me started on the path to my short- and long-term goals.

So if you’ve never considered your long-term financial plan and haven’t started saving for retirement, here’s your first step: $25 a month into a TFSA. Put it in a 50% equity/50% income balanced portfolio fund.

You’re not going to retire rich on $25 a month, but it’s a start. That’s the real key here. Get comfortable with the money going out. Don’t pay too much attention to the account (so it doesn’t become a temptation to withdraw). Just let it run on auto-pilot for a few months. Then we’ll look at the next step. It might be increasing the deposit to $50, or opening an RRSP. It might be cleaning up your budget to pay off debt faster. But don’t try to do it all at once.

Start small. Get help.

Good luck in 2012!

I spoke with John Rovansek recently about his opinions on the current investment climate in the US. Here are some of his comments.

On Wednesday, September 7, Mark Carney, the governor of the Bank of Canada, decided to hold rates steady at 1%, declaring the need for rate hikes has “diminished.” In his speech he said, “in light of slowing global economic momentum and heightened financial uncertainty, the need to withdraw monetary policy stimulus has diminished.” He cited a deeper US recession and shallower recovery as one of the reasons for the decision.

Over the past few months, I have been laying out a case for considering US and global equities for your portfolios, as part of a strategy to build positions in an asset class that has been somewhat out of favour. With this in mind, along with Mr. Carney’s interest rate decision and commentary, it made me think about corporate earnings, particularly in the USA, P/E ratios and what could impact future earnings. I asked myself this question: Are equities/stocks still cheap? The answer: That depends if you believe the numbers.

For particular stocks, the numbers look good, but for the market as a whole, it’s not so clear. Wall Street strategists have provided all kinds of models and forecasts. The crux of the mainstream bullish argument is that stocks are inexpensive based on standard measures such as price-earnings (P/E) ratios as well as the equity-risk premium. Both measures depend on corporate profit forecasts, which are open to uncertainty. As we know, the problem with forecasts is that they are about the future, and the future is unknown.

A recent report from Societe Generale’s lead global strategist, Albert Edwards, highlighted several key issues. In his report, Mr. Edwards pointed out how corporate profits were terrific in 2010, but have become less so in 2011. Labour costs are surging, which is slashing margins. Mr. Edwards thinks we are at a “tipping point” at which companies can no longer pass cost increases to a low-demand world. While this may be true, we have seen corporations respond to higher expenses by trimming all types of costs, including labour. In the US, an example of this effect and reported in late August, is zero jobs growth. Mr. Edwards also points out that the pace of unit-labour costs is a key driver of inflation and coupled with deteriorating trends in productivity suggests that earnings recovery, based largely on profit-margin expansion instead of top-line growth, is coming to an end.

Back to my question: are stocks cheap? The S&P 500 trades at approximately 13 times consensus estimate of $90 earnings per share and just 11.5 times the $102 forecast for 2012. The equity-risk premium, calculated by comparing stocks earnings yield (the inverse of the P/E) to the 10-year Treasury yield (assumed to be the risk free long term interest rate) indicates that equity asset class prospective returns should vastly exceed those of government bonds. Some stocks already sell at extremely low P/Es (10 or less), despite massive earnings growth over the past 10 years. What has this left? A group of large, global blue chip companies with rock-solid balance sheets, high dividend yields and significant cash generation potential to expand payouts selling at low valuations. An opportunity, in my opinion, worth exploring, particularly if you believe the numbers.

Photo credit: “Sale Sticker (Vector)” by Vectorportal on Flickr

Hi everyone, I was just catching up on some reading and updates when I came accross this information on the last Federal Budget. I found it written very well by a respected individual and thought you might find it informative. I hope you enjoy the read. Harvey

Click here to download a pdf of Jamie’s report on the 2011 Federal Budget.